To follow along with the CRAAP Test, we will be using this source:
Study Shows Students Are Addicted to Social Media
The Topic is: How has Social Media in the last 10 years impacted College Students
The timeliness of the information:
Ex: Study Shows Students Are Addicted to Social Media was published in 2010, which isn't within the ten years of publication that we are looking for.
The importance of the information for your needs:
Ex: Study Shows Students Are Addicted to Social Media is directed towards a General Community and does not include social media that exist now (because they did not exist then). That can create a chuck of missing information needed for an argument.
The source of the information:
Ex: Study Shows Students Are Addicted to Social Media provides one name for publishing: "niversity of Maryland, College Park" which is supposed to say "University" but provides no other information for author.
The reliability, honesty, and factuality of the content:
*See the Life Cycle of Scholarly Articles
Ex: Study Shows Students Are Addicted to Social Media uses studies with evidence. However, they are trying to prove that Social Media negatively impacts students and their evidence doesn't show the benefits. Its a bias to watch out for.
The reasons the information exists:
Ex: Study Shows Students Are Addicted to Social Media is attempting to teach, however, since there is not as much social media to analyze during the study, there could be missing information as well as more personal opinions. We do not see the study questions or any charts.
Conclusion: This is not a good source for our Thesis.